It may not display this or other websites correctly. A Smith 686 ( no, not a 686+) with a scope and an 8 3/4 inch barrel. Unlike the traditionally-designed Smith 686, the frame of the Ruger terminates in a rectangular block housing a coil mainspring assembly, which is as Ruger as it gets: it’s cheaper than shaping the frame to the grip, but it also means that a grip of any shape is possible as long as it’s larger than the frame, the manufacturing shortcut thereby being turned into an advantage for the user. I used a 686 since 1991 as a duty gun for a few years. It depends on what you are going to use it for. Galco CM102 Combat Master Belt Holster Smith & Wesson L Frame 2.5 Inch (686, 686 Plus) $ 103.00; Select options Galco DAO186 Revolver Holster Fits Ruger Alaskan® 44, Redhawk® 8 Shot 357 2.5 Inch $ 116.00; Select options Galco DAO182 Revolver Holster Fits Ruger Redhawk®, Super Redhawk… Not a match shooter just a gun enthusiast. But I am a bigger fan of the S&W trigger. If you want a shooter, better looking light more comfy gun, Smith. I'd go with a 4" for a woods gun. In the end they are all nice pistols. Triggers can be tweaked on both, though I typically don't find it needed. I own three .357’s. Fit and finish go to S&W (usually does), trigger goes to the PC 686, but it is tuned from the factory, so not a fair comparison. Can't go wrong with either. You might want to consider a ruger sp101as well. At the same time, there is one more main advantage that we have not mentioned. Again have not seen either Gun but have seen some issues with the barrels not being strieght on the smiths. Thanks guys. #22 … However, the ruger redhawk has the 8 rounds but seems a lot more expensive. Which I am thinking might be better for recoil. Today we add and show how remove a set of Houge Monogrip grips to our Ruger Redhawk. I believe I might be in the market for a new wheelgun. View Full Version : GP100 vs. S & W 686 vs. S & W 27 vs. 6 shot. Either is fine with me and I have a 686 and a 586 (better still) in my safe right now. See how the lower priced Taurus holds its own against the legendary reputation of Smith and Wesson. If your going to try for accuracy using factory ammo up to 180gr look no further than the s&w. Any advice would be greatly appreciated for this revolver rookie. Cancel Culture, Popes, Castration & ISIS = SAME. I know it shouldn't be an issue and it can be removed. A glock 20 is already in the works. S&W 686 gets my vote, I love the Smith revolvers. It just tames those 357 loads nicely. . I have examples of both of these too, and they are both very nice. s&w 625 mountain gun vs. ruger redhawk in 45 colt The Redhawk and Super Redhawk are overbuilt and quite stocky. The GP100 can usually be had for a little less money, but if I had to choose, I'd find a lightly used pre-lock 686 with a 4" barrel. The Ruger's are OK but just not as good in looks or triggers and yes the S&W is just as strong. Ferrari vs. Mercedes vs. 1999 Olds delta 88. Strong and able to handle 357s within reason. I'm looking at either a 5" Ruger GP100 or a 5" S&W 686+ pro. They both work. Here are a couple of mine, although neither is technically a 686. It looks very much like a "heavy barrel" model 66, which I happen to think is the prettiest 357 Magnum ever made. The Redhawk is reinforced to handle extra stress, making it very popular for use by handloaders as it is able to handle both .45 Colt and .44 Magnum loads. For the money, the GP100 is built to survive HOT loads better than the 686. In the end they are all nice pistols. But the Ruger GP100 is stronger than the 686 and will handle even hotter ammo. I changed the trigger rebound spring and did some polishing to get the DA pull down to 10lb 1oz. Also, back when Colt made Pythons and King Cobras the 686/586 was a 6-shot revolver as well. The 686 first debuted in the 1980’s alongside the Model 581, 586 and 681.Since then, th… In range trials, my Redhawk has printed pleasing groups with bullets of 180 to 300 grains. The 454 is something to consider. Hi, I am getting a 357 revolver very soon. I have two S&W 28's that Ive shot a lot abd both have gone back to S&W to have the cylinders and yoke tightened. The reason I decided against smith and wesson was the hilary hole. I can't decide which one to get gentleman; the Smith and Wesson 686 is about $600 and the Ruger GP100 is about 520. The 686 by Smith and Wesson came out to handle the short comings of the model 19/66 K frame magnums and to compete against the Security Six. If one is looking for the lightest trigger double action on a tuned revolver probably the S&W achieves that. Watch … RedHawk achieves its superior real-time performance by integrating the latest official release from kernel.org with key open source patches and kernel enhancements developed by Concurrent. I was thinking about using this revolver for a woods gun. Thanks in advance. The model 19 and 66 were at one point discontinued due to failures where the cylinder stop cut blew out over the chamber. I used to own a GP100 and really liked it but the 686 is an obvious contender in this search. All around better than the Ruger. It seemed like the GP100 was more accurate than my 686. I will not on that point that just like the model 27 and 28 N frame guns the 586 and 686 L frame guns have seen many years of service in use by police and have fired many heavy loads through them with no issues. I am contemplating a 686+ for the extra round. I have had several generations of the Smith and Wesson .357 revolvers and a good gunsmith can make the action feel very nice on them. Comparing a 686 to a Redhawk would be more like compaing the 686 to the S&W 27 N frame. These guns were designed to compete in the Stock Service Revolver division of International Defensive Pistol Association or, IDPA. JavaScript is disabled. Smith and Wesson 686 vs. Ruger GP100 357? Which one is the better pistol and why? Bascially it's an evolution of the model 66. These guns are very close in size and the 686 plus has the offset cylinder notches as well. Ruger super Redhawk is for biggest handgun rounds for professional hunters to shoot rounds such as 44 Magnum,454 Casull, 41 Magnum. People looking for affordable (around $500) 6” barrel .357’s will often be stuck between the Taurus 608 and the Ruger GP100 – but which is the better choice? I was wondering what the opinion on these two guns are. Any opinions and or suggestions on which is preferred. Ansys RedHawk-SC’s trusted multiphysics signoff analysis is a powerful way to reduce project and technology risk. The answer is generally 686 . I've owned both Rugers and S&W's in the past. Was away for a min kids sports and work keep me busy. S&W 686 vs Ruger gp100. Only the Korth is built to clearly higher standards. LOVE SMITH & WESSON , but after years the Smith & Wesson starts getting front end shake where the lock up is not as tight as when new. I have been reloading for over 40 years and the Ruger will stand up to hot loads better. The first is a 3" CS-1, a 686 specifically made for the Customs Service: Here is my 681 made for the NYSP. If you want to compete in revolver division competitions, a 6-shot would be your best option (686 SSR, or Ruger GP100 Match Champion). I am trying to decide which revolver would be better. I had one of the old ones in the 5.5 inch barrel. AR15.COM is the worldâs largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types. Looking at both the Smith Stainless model 629 44mag 6" & 6 1/2" barrel and the Ruger Super Red Hawk. I've about decided to invest in one really good .357 revolver for the house. But 1speedloader and your back up to speed. And yes, it is heavier than the 686. We put two iconic revolvers together to compare and contrast differences and similarities. SMITH & WESSON GOVERNOR I love the Ruger modular approach with their revolvers, and one can be taken down to a literally bare frame in a matter of minutes for a thorough wash & wax. My opinion is they are sized well and handle the 357 well and are great with 38 HBWC. Thanks for the input. But the gp 100 is not a redhawk and the 686 in not a k frame. I was making a similar decision a few years ago, but in 44 mag. Would have a 6" barrel. I have several Ruger revolvers and that Smith trigger (like most Smith triggers) is very nice right out of the box. Opinions on the S&W 686 vs the Ruger GP100: Family, Friends, Firearms > The Corner Gun Shop > Revolvers > Opinions on the S&W 686 vs the Ruger GP100. In general, a stainless GP100 6-shot costs $829 while a stainless GP100 7-shot costs $899 ($50 more expensive than its Smith & Wesson counterpart, the 686 PLUS). I have done it (I've got 3 K-frames), but rarely. I just picked up a GP100 3". I appreciate the input. I've never missed it. Looking for .357, 4" barrel, SS finish. 11-18-13, 15:53. The 686 is an extra $170 but I'm leaning towards it because I like the tapered barrel and I believe they have better triggers. The Rugers always felt to me like there were more mechanical things going on under the hood with the trigger pull than the S&W. But it bugged me and I prefer rugers cylinder release. Looking for a 357. The Ruger GP100 may be one of the smoothest shooting revolvers on this list. I will warn you, however, that a K-frame is a pretty big gun to carry concealed. Page 2 of 3 < Prev 1 2 3 Next > 1911Tuner Moderator Emeritus. RedHawk’s algorithms are certified accurate by all major foundries for all finFET processes and are proven in thousands of tapeouts. Python is the top of the heap and always has been, but 686 is also top quality and highly respected. Doctor reunited with family after living in an RV for last year, The President Biden Open-Borders, Amnesty, and Refugee Thread. With the 686 i'll have a thinner frame along with the unsightly interior lock, however i'm a huge fan of smiths and the quality of their firearms. Revolver Shootout Smith & Wesson 686 vs. Ruger GP100 .357 Magnum. It's kind of like the Super Redhawk being ok to shoot some of the hot 45 colt and 44 mag loads from custom ammo manufacturers and it states only Freedom Arms, Rugers and TC Encore able to take the extra punishment. In the redhawk (my favorite Ruger da btw) no question that this is true. Or is the Redhawk possibly better in some way than a GP100? But our motivation for testing the Ruger GP100 Match Champion and Smith & Wesson Pro Series 686 SSR 357 Magnum revolvers is more exciting than any of the arguments above. The Rugers are always built stronger and beefier while the S&Ws are a bit more svelte and generally have a trigger that will tune up nicer. All Rights Reserved. I'm in the market for a solid revolver and I've been bouncing between these two for quite some time. I still have my S&W's. There are some options for the Ruger that work with the single screw that the stock sight uses, but they're nowhere near as secure, and it's easier to change the 686 back to the stock sight, too, just slide the stock sight back into place and insert the sight screw. Many years ago, so long I forget what it was like, I used to own a GP100. Bill Ruger is credited with designing a stout “triple-locking cylinder” that stays tight after much use. They shoot great. I have a GP100 shooter. Final conclusions have been mixed on that. The finish was nice on the Python but the side plate fit left something to be desired compared to my 686. Redhawk sights give me the square, sharp image I like in irons. Done a lot of shooting with it over the past few years. The Ruger GP-100 is a little stronger than the M-686, and is easier to detail strip for cleaning and maintenance. In this instance, the L frame of the 686 denotes a medium-large frame, and is typical of modern, fullsize .357 Magnum offerings from Smith & Wesson. The Smiths tend to have better triggers, the Rugers tend to be more durable and can be field stripped like a semi-auto for cleaning. IMHO. I also like Smith triggers better. Revolver Shootout Smith & Wesson 686 vs. Ruger GP100 .357 Magnum - YouTube. Out of the box the action also stacks by design vs. the straight through pull of a Ruger or S&W. That rules out the Ruger Redhawk, it is far to large, heavy and bulky for concealed carry in anything less than heavy Winter clothing. Want one more revolver to add to my collection and because I love the looks of both hard to choose. The 686 frame comes pre-drilled so that you can securely mount an optic if you want. Attachments. One of the gun magazines back in the 1980's did a pretty thorough side by side comparison between the 686 and Python. The Rugers are always built stronger and beefier while the S&Ws are a bit more svelte and generally have a trigger that will tune up nicer. ↩ ∞ It's not unmanageable or anything, but it's pretty big. The GP100 Match Champion was a good looking BBQ gun. My wife has a Smith 686+ circa 2008 and a Ruger GP100 bought in 2011. AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own. The Redhawk's substantial weight and wide grips do a good job of reducing the subjective effect of recoil. It's just and average condition, somewhat worn pistol. Indiana Gun Owners is the most active and largest Indiana gun community online. I would find out the street price and try them one for size. It CAN shoot your intended load in Colt 45 and 45+P without a doubt. Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more. So while they are pretty strong with 31 years of duty and recreational revolver use the Ruger is OK but not really 2 car lengths ahead of S&W in durability. Appropriately loaded for the task at hand, the 686 will do what needs to be done. I do love my tiger and it is a tack driver but with the cost about the same the smith is intriguing to me. The question of S&W 686 vs. GP100 is a redundant question indeed. I am usually a Ruger fan, but that particular revolver is really nice. Wish I have a 581. Also the Redhawk grip puts steel on your palm, making recoil more noticeable. The blued version of the 686 is called the 586 and sells with a wooden grip rather than a rubber one. Sights are a wash as both have orange inserts in the front and adjustable rear sights. Order SMARTFORM 686 and it will be a truly justified choice. Ruger is pretty much idiot proof. Fit and finish go to S&W (usually does), trigger goes to the PC 686, but it is tuned from the factory, so not a fair comparison. The 686 is mostly a refinement of the S&W’s iconic revolver pedigree, established with their K/L frame revolvers. Both are great guns. Between your 2 choices, I would have to go with the S&W performance center. I'd stick to mid range loads for practice and shoot just enough full power loads to keep familiar with them.
For Honor Twitch Linkhow To Get More Viewers On Twitch, Thanos From Fortnite, Rise Against Members, Ace Hardware Firestone, Manager Resume Objective, Dennis Mcguire Therapist,